0 Datasets
0 Files
$0 Value
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessUniversity Of Oulu
This paper presents a framework to evaluate the probability that a decision error event occurs in wireless sensor networks, including sensing and communication errors. We consider a scenario where sensors need to identify whether a given event has occurred based on its periodic, noisy, observations of a given signal. Such information about the signal needs to be sent to a fusion center that decides about the actual state at that specific observation time. The communication links -- single- or multi-hop -- are modeled as binary symmetric channels, which may have different error probabilities. The decision at the fusion center is based on OR, AND, K-OUT-OF-N and MAJORITY Boolean operations on the received signals associated to individual sensor observations. We derive closed-form equations for the average decision error probability as a function of the system parameters (e.g. number of sensors and hops) and the input signal characterization. Our analyses show the best decision rule is closely related to the frequency that the observed events occur and the number of sensors. In our numerical example, we show that the AND rule outperforms MAJORITY if such an event is rare and there is only a handful number of sensors. Conversely, if there is a large number of sensors or more evenly distributed event occurrences, the MAJORITY is the best choice. We further show that, while the error probability using the MAJORITY rule asymptotically goes to 0 with increasing number of sensors, it is also more susceptible to higher channel error probabilities.
Pedro H. J. Nardelli, Iran Ramezanipour, Hirley Alves, César Thadeo de Lima, Matti Latva-aho (2015). Average Error Probability in Wireless Sensor Networks With Imperfect Sensing and Communication for Different Decision Rules. arXiv (Cornell University)
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Preprint
Year
2015
Authors
5
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access